Has this issue received any development?
I submitted a ticket to support@davinciteam, and by response, it seems they're disinterested in analyzing the problem.
Quote:
You've lost AT&T stuff because you debranded the phone, not because it became i instead of a.
If you rebrand it again to, say, this firmware Z750a R1DB005 CID52 AT&T USA, you can use AT&T apps again.
|
It's not even apps. We're getting bumped back by a webpage. It's before the firmware intricacies even have a chance to get into play. In your professional opinion: how would AT&T's
website figure out what firmware is the phone using, other than by looking at the HTTP request that the phone is sending? I'd like to be able to know if the parameters of this request (specifically
useragent string) could be adjusted in the firmware, possibly on the FS level.
Also: apart from the privilege of paying Davinci team TWICE, what are the benefits for us to de-brand our phones only to re-brand them back?